OpinionJournal columnist Peggy Noonan[thanks Jon Eisenberg] writes:
The supporters of Terri Schiavo’s right to continue living have fought
for her heroically, through the courts and through the legislatures.
They’re still fighting. They really mean it. And they have memories.On the other side of this debate, one would assume there is an equally
well organized and passionate group of organizations deeply committed to
removing Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube. But that’s not true. There’s just
about no one on the other side. Or rather there is one person, a
disaffected husband who insists Terri once told him she didn’t want to
be kept alive by extraordinary measures.He has fought the battle to kill her with a determination that at this
point seems not single-minded or passionate but strange. His former
wife’s parents and family are eager to care for her and do care for her,
every day. He doesn’t have to do a thing. His wife is not kept alive by
extraordinary measures–she breathes on her own, is not on a respirator.
All she needs to continue existing–and to continue being alive so that
life can produce whatever miracle it may produce–is a feeding tube.It doesn’t seem a lot.
So politically this is a struggle between many serious people who really
mean it and one, just one, strange-o. And the few bearded and
depressed-looking academics he’s drawn to his side.