Republican Hopefuls Demonstrate Doublespeak



Publish date

Tag(s): Archive post Legacy post
Topic(s): Uncategorized

What exactly, students sometimes ask me, is ‘doublespeak’. Now I have a paradigmatic example to show them.

Herewith the wafflings, twistings, turnings and outright mumbo-jumboing of ten wannabe Presidents.The ten GOP presidential candidates held a debate on Thursday evening. Moderator Chris Matthews of MSNBC asked the candidates about stem cell research. Here is that section of the debate transcript.

Moderator: We have to go down the line again. It’s always fun to ask
these questions down the line. We have Mr. Reagan here. The camera will
not focus on her, but I will tell you, it will now focus on you.

Mrs. Reagan wants to expand federal funding of embryonic stem cell
research. Will that progress under your administration, Governor?

Romney: It certainly will. Altered nuclear transfer, I think, is perhaps
the best source…

Moderator: Embryonic. Embryonic.

Romney: Altered nuclear transfer creates embryo-like cells that can be
used for stem cell research. In my view, that’s the most promising
source. I have a deep concern about curing disease.

I have a wife that has a serious disease that could be affected by stem
cell research and others. But I will not — I will not create new
embryos through cloning or through embryo farming, because that will be
creating life for the purpose of destroying it.

Moderator: And you won’t take any from these fertility clinics to use

Romney: I’m happy to allow that to — or I shouldn’t say happy. It’s
fine for that to be allowed, to be legal. I won’t use our government
funds for that. Instead, I want our governments to be used on Dr.
Hurlbut’s method, which is altered nuclear transfer.

Moderator: The same question, embryonic stem cell research with federal
funds, sir.

Brownback: It will not, with all due respect to Mrs. Reagan and her
desires here. I’ve studied this matter a great deal. We are curing and
healing people with adult stem cells.

Moderator: OK.

Brownback: It is not necessary to kill a human life for us to heal
people. And we’re doing it with adult stem cell work, and it’s getting

Moderator: OK. I’m going to have to go yes or no.

Governor Gilmore, for embryonic stem cell federal funding or not?

Gilmore: We can’t create people in order to experiment with people.

Moderator: Governor Huckabee?

Huckabee: I would concur. I don’t think it’s right to create a life to
end a life. That’s not a good health decision.

Moderator: Congressman?

Hunter: No. I’d like to show Mrs. Reagan the alternatives, which are
adult stem cells.

Moderator: Governor Thompson.

Thompson: There’s so much research going on, Chris, you cannot answer
that question yes or no. There’s research currently going on right now
at the Weissman Center (ph) in Madison, Wisconsin, that’s going to allow
for adult stem cells to become pluripotent, which will have the same
characteristics of embryonic stem cells, so you do not have to kill an

Moderator: Senator, embryonic stem cell federal funding.

McCain: I want to thank Mrs. Reagan for the many kindnesses extended to
me many — and my fellow prisoners of war many years ago when we came
home to this wonderful state.

I believe that we need to fund this. This is a tough issue for those of
us in the pro-life community. I would remind you that these stem cells
are either going to be discarded or perpetually frozen.

We need to do what we can to relieve human suffering. It’s a tough
issue. I support federal funding.

Moderator: That’s a yes. Dr. Paul, yes or no on federal funding?

Paul: Programs like this are not authorized under the Constitution.

The trouble with issues like this is, in Washington we either prohibit
it or subsidize it. And the market should deal with it, and the states
should deal with it.

Moderator: OK. That’s a no.

Giuliani: As long as we’re not creating life in order to destroy it, as
long as we’re not having human cloning, and we limit it to that, and
there is plenty of opportunity to then use federal funds in those
situations where you have limitations.

So I would support it with those limitations, like Senator Coleman’s
bill in Congress.

Moderator: Mr. Tancredo?

Tancredo: There are billions of dollars going into this research right
now. It does not require me taking money from federal — from taxpayers
in the United States to fund it…

Moderator: OK. Thank you.

Tancredo: … because it is morally, I think, reprehensible in certain

-Art Caplan

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Privacy Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.