The bullseye on Bush

Author

sysadmin

Publish date

Tag(s): Archive post Legacy post
Topic(s): Uncategorized

photoshopped image of a lyme disease rash with a W in the middle

It came out earlier this month that President Bush was treated a year ago for what looked like a case of Lyme disease*. This information only came to light recently as part of the president’s annual physical — and it was a bit of a footnote. The low-key manner of the disclosure prompted a few accusations that the White House was “hiding” Bush’s condition. Of course, these accusations were probably inflected by partisanship. But even the AP accorded the story a bit of a raised eyebrow. From the story (emphasis added):

President Bush was treated for Lyme disease last August, the White House announced Wednesday after failing to disclose the problem for nearly a year.

According to reports, Bush got the standard course of antibiotics and he didn’t seem to encounter any symptoms beyond the infamous bullseye rash. And the team of physicians checking under the president’s hood declared him, according to the White House, “in superior fitness for a man his age.”

Did it matter that the American public wasn’t aware of Mr. Bush’s rash? Um, probably not. But then, again, why do we even bother with the multi-doctor, multi-day presidential check-up? Is it for propaganda purposes? (Yeah, we’re bogged down in Iraq, but for an old guy, our commander-in-chief can totally rock a mountain bike!) Sure, there’s probably some of that, especially after all the presidential ailments that have gone hidden throughout history. But there is a practical part to it all, as well: Mr. Bush is the head of state and if his health was seriously compromised, we’d all probably want to know.

So, where do we draw the line? What constitutes a “reportable” presidential ailment? And in what detail? Should the president’s colonoscopy be put on YouTube? Does the President of the United States have a right to medical privacy?

That image at the top of this post is from Design Observer, which had a little fun with the presidential rash idea.

*Apparently Texas has its own Lyme-like disease called STARI. Unlike other things, though, it appears to be smaller in Texas.

-Greg Dahlmann

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Privacy Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.