Washington Post reports on a very important study by the consumer advocacy group Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, in which it is estimated that malpractice insurers overstated their losses by 31% from 1986 to 1994.
Related posts
What Should Have Happened in the Tragic Case of Adriana Smith?
What should have happened in the tragic case of Adriana Smith, the two-months-pregnant woman who was declared brain dead but has been on life support since February at Emory Hospital in Atlanta, so that her baby might eventually be delivered by C-section? The hospital refused to let her die, concerned it would violate Georgia’s abortion […]
The Adriana Smith Case Unfolding in Atlanta Raises Many Questions
The widely discussed Adriana Smith case unfolding in Atlanta raises many thorny ethical questions. Despite the case’s high profile, the facts about what happened that led to a situation in which Emory University Hospital Midtown plans to deliver a fetus from a woman who has been dead for months, via C-section in August, are murky. […]
Getting it Right: “The Pitt’s” Depiction of Neurodiversity
A decade ago, we wrote an AJOB blog post critiquing the then-new medical drama Chicago Med. We took the pilot to task for its lack of verisimilitude, despite the myriad ethical issues highlighted in that episode. We watched the show with some regularity for a few seasons but eventually lost interest as the show veered […]
Bioethics’ Identity Crisis: Are We Asking It to Be What It Is Not?
This editorial appears in the May 2025 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics. As the “bio” in “bioethics” suggests, the topics under the purview of bioethics have expanded to include issues that affect our health and well-being that extend beyond clinical settings. This is largely due to our growing understanding of the social, political, cultural, […]