HARP is a resource for patients, doctors, and attorneys seeking to establish the liability of HMOs, Managed Health Care Organizations, and Nursing Facilities for the consequences of their decisions.
Health Administration Responsibility Project
Related posts
Can Researchers Experience Moral Distress?
In the context of healthcare, moral distress has traditionally described the emotional and psychological distress healthcare providers experience when they are prevented from acting in the way they feel is most ethical or just. Their moral agency is typically constrained by institutional policies, pressures, or a lack of resources. NPR, for instance, recently reported on […]
Why Bioethics Matters in the Debate Over Routine Infant Circumcision
Bioethics exists to help us think clearly about difficult medical decisions, especially when those decisions affect individuals who cannot speak for themselves. At its core, bioethics asks a set of enduring questions: Who decides? Who bears the risks? And what obligations do we have to protect the most vulnerable? These questions arise across medicine, but […]
An Open Letter to the American Red Cross and the International Red Cross: Calling for Immediate Humanitarian Visits to ICE Internment Facilities in Texas
February 27, 2026 The death of an immigrant detainee at an El Paso, Texas facility has been ruled a homicide, according to the final autopsy report obtained by NBC News. Geraldo Lunas Campos, 55, originally from Cuba, died January 3rd at Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Camp East Montana facility at Fort Bliss, Texas. “Based on […]
Citation Accuracy in the Make America Healthy Again Report (MAHA)
This editorial appears in the March Issue of the American Journal of Bioethics ncreasing attention has been devoted to questionable research practices (QRPs) in the health and behavioral sciences. Practices such as presenting post hoc findings as if they were a priori hypotheses, failing to report null results in a study with multiple outcomes, and […]